Materiali a base di termite attiva scoperti nelle polveri dei collassi delle WTC del 9/11 2001 - [ parte VII ]

Dalla FEMA fino ad Harrit, passando anche per i laboratori dell' "Indian Head Division of the Naval Surface Warfare Center"... ancora qualche parola sulla "nano-thermite"

Ancora qualche parola sulla "nano-thermite"... dopo l'articolo del professore Harrit ( e Farrer, Jones, Legge, Farnsworth, Roberts, Gourley, Larsen ) pubblicato dalla Bentham Open, e dopo tutto il polverone (modello cortina fumogena) messo in campo dai 'pezzi da novanta' del mondo debunker ( senza però che minimamente si siano scomodati ad eseguire nuove analisi che potessero concretamente contraddire i risultati ottenuti da Harrit e soci ), ecco che arriva a disposizione del pubblico - grazie all'impegno dei TruthSeeker, ed imparticolare di Aidan Monaghan - un nuovo interessante filone di informazioni su cui prestare attenzione.

Ma prima di affrontare queste nuove info, permettetemi un passo indietro nel tempo... addirittura fino a quello della pubblicazione del 'famigerato' "Appendix C del " World Trade Center Building Performance Study"...

eh già, perchè le parole di Harrit e soci, ad alcuni fanno schifo, ma la FEMA all'epoca già scriveva che:
"the severe erosion found in several beams warranted further consideration"

Studio, quello del FEMA, che proseguiva con parole come queste:
"Evidence of a severe high temperature corrosion attack on the steel, including oxidation and sulfidation with subsequent intergranular melting, was readily visible in the near-surface microstructure. A liquid eutectic mixture containing primarily iron, oxygen, and sulfur formed during this hot corrosion attack on the steel. This sulfur-rich liquid penetrated preferentially down grain boundaries of the steel, severely weakening the beam and making it susceptible to erosion. The eutectic temperature for this mixture strongly suggests that the temperatures in this region of the steel beam approached 1,000 C (1,800 F), which is substantially lower than would be expected for melting this steel."

"The unusual thinning of the member is most likely due to an attack of the steel by grain boundary penetration of sulfur forming sulfides that contain both iron and copper. Figures C-10, C-11, and C-12 show the region of severe corrosion at different levels of magnification".

e quindi concludeva con un ESPLICITO:
- C.6 Suggestions for Future Research
The severe corrosion and subsequent erosion of Samples 1 and 2 are a very unusual event.
No clear explanation for the source of the sulfur has been identified.
The rate of corrosion is also unknown.
It is possible that this is the result of long-term heating in the ground following the collapse of the buildings. It is also possible that the phenomenon started prior to collapse and accelerated the weakening of the steel structure. A detailed study into the mechanisms of this phenomenon is needed to determine what risk, if any, is presented to existing steel structures exposed to severe and long-burning fires.

Come su detto, queste "suggestions" non sono state minimamente prese in considerazione dal NIST.

Per descrivere questo menefreghismo, posso usare a prestito le parole di Kevin Rayan:
"The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has had considerable
difficulty determining a politically correct sequence of events for the unprecedented
destruction of three World Trade Center (WTC) buildings on 9/11 (Douglas 2006, Ryan
2006, Gourley 2007). But despite a number of variations in NIST’s story, it never
considered explosives or pyrotechnic materials in any of its hypotheses. This omission is at odds with several other striking facts; first, the requirement of the national standard for fire investigation (NFPA 921), which calls for testing related to thermite and other pyrotechnics, and second, the extensive experience NIST investigators have with explosive and thermite materials"

o quotare direttamente quelle dello stesso NIST:
"In summary, NIST found no corroborating evidence for alternative hypotheses suggesting that the WTC towers were brought down by controlled demolition using explosives planted prior to Sept. 11, 2001" [ FAQ #2 ]

Corretti? no? chissà come mai!?
Comunque:
"The severe corrosion and subsequent erosion...are a very unusual event"! "No clear explanation for the source of the sulfur has been identified", eppure: analisi non fatte dal NIST, analisi non fatte dai 'debunker'...per fortuna c'hanno pensato Harrit e soci ( dei privati cittadini!!!) a svolgere analisi in laboratorio sul materiale a loro disposizione!!!

Quindi grazie allo studio e alle analisi scientifiche di Harrit e co., adesso ne sappiamo di più.
E per quanto il loro lavoro necessiti di ulteriori indagini ( sia per confutare definitivamente le critiche che i debunker si sono affannati a tirare fuori , sia per sgombrare il campo da qualsiasi ulteriore illazione ), non posso non riportare - per l'ennesima volta - quelle che sono le conclusioni a cui i risultati delle analisi li hanno portati:
"Based on these observations, we conclude that the red layer of the red/gray chips we have discovered in the WTC dust is active, unreacted thermitic material, incorporating nanotechnology, and is a highly energetic pyrotechnic or explosive material."

E siccome:
"Commercially available thermite behaves as an incendiary when ignited [6], but when the ingredients are ultra-fine grain (UFG) and are intimately mixed, this «nanothermite» reacts very rapidly, even explosively, and is sometimes referred to as «super-thermite» [20, 22]"
diventa interessante aggiungere queste info ( che non stupiran nessuno dei Truth Seekers ): ovvero le risposte alle FOIA presentate da Aidan, per avere informazioni dal "Indian Head Division of the Naval Surface Warfare Center, (parte del Naval Sea Systems Command or NAVSEA)", circa quanti e quali dati e studi e ricerche avessero intrapreso ai tempi del 9/11, sulle "nano-sized and Ultra Fine Grained (UFG) aluminium powders, nano-sized and Ultra Fine Grained (UFG) iron oxide powders or other metal oxide powders and Metastable Intermolecular Composites"

Domandina mica tanto campata per aria, visto che l' "Indian Head Division of the Naval Surface Warfare Center", già nel 1999, veniva descritto come:
"the only reliable source of aluminum nanopowders in the United States"
e nel 2008, veniva citato come: "probably the most prominent US center for nano-thermite technology"

Bene, secondo voi cosa hanno risposto?
Quanto hanno reso onore all Freedom Information Act ( anche loro come il BTS [*vedi QUI ])?

E, soprattutto, come mai, anche in questo caso, come in tutti quelli che riguardano quel tragico 9/11, dalle fonti ufficiali è impossibile ottenere altro che non sia 'diniego', 'vaghezza' e 'omissione'?

Infatti anche l'"Indian Head" ha pensato bene di rispondere:
"Personnel at the Technical Library were unsuccesful in finding any pertinent information on the above subject. Research may have been conducted by Indian Head Division personnel but not submitted."

E, addirittura, tanto per aumentare l'aura di alone e mistero, se ne sciaqcuano le mani spergiurando che pure per l'"Indian Head's private sector partnerships":
"Small Business Innovative Research (SBIR) records are kept for a maximum of 7 years and any records responsive to your request have been destroied.".

Mhmmm, non c'è che dire: muti come pesci, e sempre pronti a spargere fumo come se non sapessero nemmeno di cosa parlano!

Peccato che già nel 2002:
"FY01 Technology Transfer Business Plan: IHDIV is considered the Navy’s Center of Excellence for Energetics development and has extensive expertise, capabilities, and information in energetics synthesis, formulation, and processing as well as in testing of energetic systems. IHDIV will transfer their knowledge of development and manufacturing energetics with respect to the use of TECHNANOGY produced nanoaluminum and supply TECHNANOGY with test data associated with the testing of TECHNANOGY nanoaluminum. TECHNANOGY is a leader in the production of nanoaluminum for use in energetic systems utilized for DoD purposes. To our knowledge, TECHNANOGY is the sole supplier of nanoaluminum for use in pilot scale processing. TECHNANOGY will share their material and knowledge of nanoaluminum processing subject to the terms and conditions of this CRADA. (cooperative research and development agreement)."

o anche che:
"The Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Program ... ensures that the nation's small, high-tech, innovative businesses are a significant part of the federal government's research and development efforts."

Qua di seguito ecco le scansioni delle risposte alle FOIA d Aiden:






L'articolo originale di Aidan Monaghan, lo potete leggere su 9/11Blogger, a questo indirizzo

...Torna alla HOME