tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7213924484852203024.post6979133278964855464..comments2012-02-14T02:29:15.367+01:00Comments on 9/11 inside job -= Italian Truth Seekers =-: Un altro documento ufficiale, con le parole del Commander Colonel Marr, avvalora quanto sostenuto dall'analisi dei messaggi ACARS di UA 939/11_admin_superuserhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13338941321264820866noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7213924484852203024.post-55792246042933286072010-03-02T02:15:51.698+01:002010-03-02T02:15:51.698+01:00ciao Schottolo, adesso ti invio una mail.
lascia ...ciao Schottolo, adesso ti invio una mail.<br /><br />lascia perdere DNotice...pura disinfo. bleah.T.pointhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12568682621565394809noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7213924484852203024.post-89577018408864535582010-03-01T17:01:32.842+01:002010-03-01T17:01:32.842+01:00Sei riuscito a iscriverti?, hanno risposto questo:...Sei riuscito a iscriverti?, hanno risposto questo:<br /><br />-<br /><br />schottolo,<br /><br />didn't you read my article on UAL below? You say:<br /><br />"A) UAL don't have a radar. Physically, don't trace nothing. UAL (the company) is in contact "direct physical" with it's aircraft through the "ACARS". The FAA have the radar and follows the "blip" on the screens.<br />And as the story say, at one point turning off the transponder. The FAA lost also that 'blip'."<br /><br />UAL did have radar on 9/11. Sophisticated radar. It was built for them by United Visual in 1997-8. I really wish people would read my articles! This is very distressing.<br />-- http://unitedvisual.com/2fac/2fm109.asp<br /><br />Also, when secondary radar is deactivated, the FAA (and UAL on 9/11) don't lose radar contact with aircraft. They can still track aircraft via primary radar. As UAL Aircraft Router Dave Rogoski stated in 1999 about UAL's Special Operations Center, "We get a good idea where an airplane is, how it's being affected by the natural elements and how it fits into the air traffic control picture." On September 11, 2001 UAL was getting feeds from ATC radar.<br /><br />However, I agree with the second part of your answer to rm: Radar has noting to do with this situation.<br /><br />Dean Jackson/Editor-in-Chief DNotice.org<br />Washington, DC<br /><br />-<br /><br />In effetti anche a me piacerebbe conoscere la risposta.schottolohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14249472867082967090noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7213924484852203024.post-87672144508553382042010-02-28T22:44:09.484+01:002010-02-28T22:44:09.484+01:00azz, prima lo devo tradurre okkaay.azz, prima lo devo tradurre okkaay.schottolohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14249472867082967090noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7213924484852203024.post-21736836425955017852010-02-28T22:37:41.565+01:002010-02-28T22:37:41.565+01:00Semmai gli scrivo la tua risposta e li rimando quì...Semmai gli scrivo la tua risposta e li rimando quì.<br /><br />Comunque, se è da poco che aspetti ok, altrimenti dovrebbero attivarlo subito.<br />Ciao, grazie.schottolohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14249472867082967090noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7213924484852203024.post-371746917639127892010-02-28T19:42:32.212+01:002010-02-28T19:42:32.212+01:00Ciao Schottolo,
su 911Blogger ancor ann mi han at...Ciao Schottolo,<br /><br />su 911Blogger ancor ann mi han attivato l'account, così ti rispondo qui.<br /><br />Occhio che le domande sono abbastanza fallaci: mescolando pere con mele. FAA e UAL son due entità ben differenti e distinte.<br /><br />Q ) - "If United and the FAA were tracking different flights, did they agree that each of their respective Flight 93s had originated at Newark airport?"<br /><br />A ) - Quello ufficiale vero di UA 93 ( cioè N591UA in contatto con la UAL ) di sicuro decolla da EWR<br />[ vedasi tra l'altro il doc: UASSI1-00000398 ]<br />http://www.scribd.com/doc/16345059/T7-B18-UAL-Jumpseat-Fdr-Entire-Contents-UA-175-and-UA-93-Emails-and-Documents-562<br /><br />*******************************<br />Q ) - "Were they unable to track these flights by radar after a certain point? "<br /><br />A ) - UAL non ha radar. non traccia fisicamente nulla. UAL ( la compagnia ) è in contatto "fisico diretto" con i suoi aerei tramite gli acars. La FAA 'ha' i radar e segue i "blip" sugli schermi.<br />E come la storia racconta, ad un certo punto spegnendo il transponder, la FAA si perse anche quel 'blip'.<br /><br />*******************************<br /><br />Q ) - "And if so, what was the location on the flight path of each Flight 93 when it was lost to radar? "<br /><br />A ) - la FAA ha perso il contatto radar con "ua93" ( dove e quando, come da VU ). la UAL ha continuato tranquillamente ad essere in "contatto fisico" ( messaggi inviati e fisicamente ricevuti dall'aereo ) con UA 93 N591UA, fino alle 10:10.<br /><br />Esiste, da tracciati radar, un solo flight path, perchè come su detto, solo la FAA traccia con i radar. Ma l'aereo che la FAA stava tracciando sui radar, non può essere lo stesso ( o almeno non da un certo punto in avanti, Cleveland ) con il quale il sistema ACARS ha continuato fisicamente a comunicare, e da RGS ben fuori portata rispetto a dove si trovava l "ua93" seguito dalla FAA<br /><br />******************************<br /><br />Q ) - "Did they--as a result of actually having been tracking different flights--reach different conclusions re where Flight 93 wound up?"<br /><br />A ) - Le conclusioni, come di dovere che sia, sono state raggiunte dall 9/11 Commission e dalla FBI e dal NTSB. La UAl non ha alcuna voce in capitolo in merito alle indagini.<br />**************************<br /><br />spero di averti fornito lumi in maniera abbastanza esauriente.<br /><br />BambooboyT.pointhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12568682621565394809noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7213924484852203024.post-54716098714228303742010-02-28T12:23:30.760+01:002010-02-28T12:23:30.760+01:00L'ho inserito quì:
http://www.911blogger.com/...L'ho inserito quì: <br />http://www.911blogger.com/node/22732<br /><br />Te che ne sai di più, riesci a chiarire i dubbi che potrebbero emergere nei commenti dello stesso?<br /><br />Vedi questo:<br /><br />rm:<br /><br />If United and the FAA were tracking different flights, did they agree that each of their respective Flight 93s had originated at Newark airport? Were they unable to track these flights by radar after a certain point? And if so, what was the location on the flight path of each Flight 93 when it was lost to radar? Did they--as a result of actually having been tracking different flights--reach different conclusions re where Flight 93 wound up?schottolohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14249472867082967090noreply@blogger.com